Key Evidence Allowed in Roundup Trial

Monsanto

A federal judge has allowed certain pieces of evidence considered to be “controversial” to be used in an upcoming trial involving Monsanto’s herbicide product Roundup.

Controversial Evidence

The evidence is thought to be disputed by Monsanto due to its portrayal of the company’s supposed attempts to influence scientific studies regarding Roundup. The company claims that this type of evidence will only serve as a distraction to jurors from scientific evidence. However, lawyers for the plaintiff argued that despite having links to corporate misconduct, the evidence is still rooted in scientific research and is able to be used.

Hope for Hardeman

This ruling will affect the case of Edwin Hardeman’s upcoming trial, set to begin it’s first phase on February 25th (read more about his case here) and two other cases that have yet to be heard.

A Key Factor

Lawyer’s for the plaintiff consider the evidence of Monsanto’s influence as a cornerstone to their argument about Roundup’s safety, and was a key part in the $289 million dollar verdict awarded to groundskeeper Dewayne Johnson last year (get more details on his case here). Monsanto has indicated they will appeal Dewayne Johnson’s case verdict.

Injured by Roundup?

If you or a loved one have been injured as a result of using Roundup, contact our office at (303)-999-9999 or (303)-835-9342 to schedule a free consultation and speak with one of our highly experienced attorneys. Please also visit our practice area page on Roundup here for additional information.