The driver told the officer they were watching the road, and that one sentence is now sitting between you and everything you are owed. You saw the car drift. You saw that it never slowed. What almost no one tells you at the scene is that your claim does not have to rest on the driver’s version of events, because the phone in their hand and the computer in their dashboard both kept their own record. Our Westminster car accident lawyers build cases out of those records, and a record is much harder to take back than a statement.
Colorado’s hands-free law reset what counts as illegal phone use behind the wheel, and that change works in your favor. Boesen Law puts together the file that ties the driver’s screen to the moment of impact and to the treatment you have needed since. Your first meeting is a free, in-person consultation, and there is no attorney fee unless we recover compensation for you.
Reach out to our law firm for a no-cost, no-obligation consultation today. Call our personal injury lawyers in the state of Colorado at (303) 999-9999 or contact us online.
How a Westminster Distracted Driving Accident Attorney Proves What Happened
Distraction is the rare kind of fault that leaves a timestamp. The whole job is reaching that timestamp before it cycles out of a carrier’s system or a body shop clears the car.
Here is the work our team does on a distraction claim:
- Send preservation demands in the first days. We put the driver, their insurer, and the repair facility on written notice not to wipe, sell, or reset anything, which turns later destruction of evidence into a problem for them rather than for you.
- Subpoena carrier records and in-app activity. Billing logs show calls and messages, but the app-level timestamps show something better, the exact second a screen was touched, streamed to, or typed on.
- Pull the infotainment module out of the vehicle. A paired handset leaves traces in the car itself, including active calls, media control, and navigation entries made while the wheels were turning.
- Line the data up against the crash timeline. We put the phone activity, the event data recorder speed trace, and the signal timing side by side so the gap between the hazard appearing and any braking becomes measurable.
- Read the physical evidence for the absence of a reaction. No skid, no swerve, and full impact speed tell their
- own story, and reconstruction turns that story into an opinion an insurer has to answer.
- Take the adjuster off your calendar. Every call, form, and records request comes to us, so nobody talks you into a recorded statement while you are on pain medication.
Boesen Law has been doing this work across the north metro for decades, and inattention remains the leading cause of the distracted driving crashes we are asked to prove. Someone answers our phone at every hour, including nights and weekends, and we are glad to walk you through what claims built on this kind of evidence have gone on to recover.
What Colorado’s Hands-Free Law Means for Your Claim
Every driver owes you attention, and Colorado has now put a sharper edge on what that means. Since the hands-free law took effect in 2025, a driver may not hold a mobile electronic device at all while operating a vehicle. Hands-free accessories are allowed for adults. Drivers under eighteen are not permitted to use a phone for any purpose, emergencies aside. The older framing that only outlawed reading and sending texts no longer describes the rule, which matters because a driver who tells the adjuster they were “just looking at the map” is describing a violation rather than a defense.
That violation does real work in a civil claim. It shows a duty written into statute, a breach of exactly the conduct the statute names, and a crash of precisely the kind the legislature had in mind. Negligence stops being an argument about what a careful driver would have done and becomes a comparison between a written rule and a documented act. The scale behind the rule is not small either. The Colorado Department of Transportation’s distracted driving statistics show that 676 Coloradans lost their lives to distracted driving between 2014 and 2024, which is the backdrop every adjuster has in mind when a phone record lands on their desk.
None of this decides your case on its own, and it is not meant to. It sets the floor. If you are not sure whether what the other driver was doing crosses that line, bring the facts to Boesen Law and we will look at them with you in a free consultation.
What Pulls a Westminster Driver’s Attention Off the Road
Distraction is not one behavior, and the difference matters because each version leaves its evidence somewhere else. A driver reaching for a drink leaves nothing on a phone bill but a great deal on a dashcam. A driver following turn-by-turn directions leaves nothing on a call log but a clear trail in the navigation history. Before we subpoena anything, we work out which kind of distraction the crash pattern points to.
Around Westminster, the collisions we are asked to prove tend to come from a short list:
- Messaging and social apps on the stop-and-go stretches of Federal Boulevard, where a queue forms faster than a driver looking down expects.
- Navigation and music entry, which pulls a hand and a set of eyes away at the exact moment traffic ahead compresses.
- Voice and video calls, where a driver keeps both hands on the wheel and still fails to register a car braking in front of them.
- Food, grooming, and reaching into the back seat, common on the commuter run along 92nd Avenue.
- Passengers and dashboard screens, which draw attention inside the cabin on wide, fast-moving roads such as Sheridan Boulevard.
Most of these end the same way, with a driver arriving at stopped traffic at full speed, which is why so many distraction files are also rear-end accident files. If a driver who was not looking hurt you, Boesen Law can find the record that shows it.
Injuries Caused by Distracted Driving Crashes in Westminster
An attentive driver brakes, and braking sheds energy before impact. A distracted one does not, so the collision happens at something close to full travelling speed. That single difference explains why these crashes hurt people more than the damage to the bumpers suggests, and why symptoms so often arrive days later rather than at the roadside.
- Whiplash and cervical strain, where the neck is thrown through its range of motion faster than muscle can brace, and neck injuries after a rear-end collision frequently surface only once the adrenaline fades.
- Herniated and bulging discs, sending pain, numbness, or weakness down an arm or a leg.
- Concussion and post-concussive symptoms, including headaches, light sensitivity, and difficulty holding concentration through a working day.
- Shoulder, wrist, and sternum injuries from bracing against the wheel and loading the seat belt at the instant of contact.
- Knee and hip trauma where the lower body is driven into the dash or the footwell.
- Catastrophic injuries in the worst of these crashes, and a wrongful death claim for families who lose someone to a driver who simply was not looking.
The difference between a fairly valued claim and a discounted one is usually made in the first month of treatment, before an insurer has room to call a symptom pre-existing. Our team works alongside your treating providers from the beginning so the medical record says plainly what changed on the day of the crash.
Compensation Available After a Distracted Driving Crash in Westminster
What a distraction claim is worth turns on how completely each category is documented, and on whether anyone bothered to price the parts of your life the injury quietly took over.
Economic Damages
This is everything with a receipt or a projection behind it: emergency treatment, imaging, orthopedic and neurological care, physical therapy, injections, prescriptions, and the mileage to get to all of it. The income side is where these claims are most often shortchanged, because lost wages reach further than the shifts already missed, taking in reduced hours, forfeited overtime, leave you had to burn, and any lasting drop in what you are able to earn.
Non-Economic Damages
This category answers for pain, broken sleep, the anxiety that shows up at a green light, and the parts of your week you have handed over to appointments. Colorado sets a ceiling on non-economic damages, and that ceiling rises when clear and convincing evidence establishes serious physical impairment.
Future Medical and Care Costs
Where your physicians expect continuing treatment, further injections, or surgery down the line, that cost belongs in the claim now rather than in a bill you meet alone in three years. We work with treating specialists and economists to put a defensible figure on it.
Boesen Law has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for clients across Colorado, and that record comes from refusing to let a carrier decide what a category is worth. Sit down with us at no cost and we will talk through what your own claim may support.
Do You Have a Westminster Distracted Driving Claim?
Nick McWharter, a Colorado native who brings an economics and mathematics background to the way he builds injury claims, notes:
“Clients apologize to me for not having proof, and I tell them the same thing every time, that proof is my job and it is usually already sitting on a server somewhere. Three patterns show up again and again in the files that hold together. The other driver was cited, or said something useful at the scene before an adjuster got to them. There is a record with a clock on it, a call log, an app timestamp, an infotainment entry, footage from a business camera. And the injuries were treated early and consistently enough that the timeline speaks for itself. When those three line up, I am no longer arguing about whether the driver was distracted. I am showing it.”
Fault being obvious does not mean the money is. The at-fault driver’s liability limits are only the first layer, and your own uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage, medical payments coverage, and any policy in your household can add to what is actually available to pay for this.
What Cases Like Yours Have Recovered
Two Boesen Law results show what inattention claims of this kind have produced:
- $1,025,000 for a client involved in a four-car accident and rear-ended, who had prior spinal injuries and signs of a concussion, was hospitalized, and began therapy for depression and anxiety after the crash.
- $300,000 for a client who was making a turn when another vehicle pulled out in front of them, presenting at hospital with severe whiplash and later reporting chronic back and neck pain.
Our full case results give a wider picture of what this kind of preparation produces.
If a driver who was not paying attention hurt you in Westminster, tell us what happened and we will give you a straight answer about where you stand.
Contact a Westminster Distracted Driving Accident Attorney at Boesen Law
A few seconds of someone else’s screen time can cost you months of appointments, a stretch of missed paychecks, and a good deal of sleep. The part worth holding onto is that the evidence which proves it almost always exists on the day of the crash. Whether it still exists in three months depends on how quickly somebody moves to protect it.
You can arrange a free, in-person consultation as soon as you are ready to talk it through. A Westminster injury suit is filed in the Adams County District Court at the justice center in Brighton, part of the Seventeenth Judicial District, and we take care of that end of it. Someone answers our phone at every hour, including nights and weekends, our staff can work with you in English, Russian, or Spanish, and there is no attorney fee unless we recover compensation for you.
FAQs About Westminster Distracted Driving Accidents
I was a passenger when my own driver got distracted. Can I bring a claim?
Yes, and passengers are in one of the strongest positions there is, because you did nothing to cause the crash and no one can seriously argue otherwise. Making a claim against the driver who was carrying you feels uncomfortable to a lot of people, particularly when that driver is a friend or a relative. In practice you are making a claim against their insurance policy, which is the exact situation the policy was bought for. If more than one driver contributed, you may have a claim against each of them, and we sort out that split so you are not caught in the middle of it.
The driver denies being on their phone. What actually proves otherwise?
Denial is the norm rather than the exception, which is why we treat distraction as something to document instead of something to debate. Carrier records establish calls and messages. App-level data goes further and shows interaction with a screen down to the second. The vehicle’s infotainment system records a paired handset, media control, and navigation entries. Alongside that we look for business and doorbell cameras on the corridor and for the physical proof of a driver who never reacted at all. Any one of these can be argued with. Together they rarely are.
Does Colorado’s hands-free law apply if the driver was only holding the phone for directions?
It does. Since 2025 the restriction is about holding a mobile electronic device at all, not about what the driver was doing with it, so navigation gets no exemption for an adult driver holding a handset. Hands-free operation is permitted for adults. For drivers under eighteen the ban is complete and covers any use of a phone. A driver who explains that they were only checking the map has described conduct the statute prohibits.
Will the phone records still exist if I wait a few months to call a lawyer?
Some of them will not, and this is the part that costs people real money. Colorado allows three years from the date of most motor vehicle crashes to file suit under C.R.S. § 13-80-101, but the time limits on personal injury cases are far more generous than the evidence is. Detailed carrier records are kept for months, not years. Business and doorbell footage is often overwritten inside a fortnight. A vehicle sold or repaired takes its infotainment data with it. The filing deadline is the last date you can act, never the best one.
The insurer says I share the blame because I stopped short. Can they do that?
They can raise it, and on a distraction claim they very often do, because shaving a percentage off is cheaper for them than disputing fault outright. Colorado applies a modified comparative negligence rule under C.R.S. § 13-21-111, so you recover as long as your share stays under 50 percent, reduced by whatever share is assigned to you. Stopping for traffic, a light, or a turning car is lawful driving, and the answer to the argument is the same evidence that proves the distraction, because a driver who was looking would have stopped too.
Reach out to our law firm for a no-cost, no-obligation consultation today. Call our personal injury lawyers in the state of Colorado at (303) 999-9999 or contact us online.
Content Reviewed By
